398
Beyond Amenability and Technology: Key Constraints in the
Wider Deployment of Sorting Systems
Richard Bearman, David Bowman
Bear Rock Solutions Pty. Ltd.
Greg Wilkie
Diamondbacks Pty. Ltd.
Robert Dunne
Robert Dunne Consulting
ABSTRACT: The amenability of a given mineral, or orebody, to sorting and preconcentration and the sensing/
sorting technology required, attracts a great deal of attention. Beyond this base amenability, the practical uptake
and implementation of sorting systems is highly reliant on the wider system and the overall impact on project
financial metrics. Key factors to consider include, consistency of performance, materials handling, stream
preparation, destination for sorting products, operability, derived revenue and cost. Another key area relates to
the evaluation of sorting within the context of a mine studies timeline and implications for other areas in the
studies. The factors are examined and described, with the aim of identifying to potential users of sorting, what
factors must be considered as part of the wider deployment picture.
INTRODUCTION
The focus and targets for sorting are highly dependent on
the orebody and end-use. Broadly, in metalliferous ores,
the target is grade enhancement, whilst in bulk commodi-
ties, including industrial minerals, the priority is qual-
ity. Examples of sorting targets, outside of direct grade
enhancement, include those shown in Table 1.
Industrial minerals applications represent significant
market segments, particularly for particle-based sorters.
The largest overall sorter installations are found in this sec-
tor, including the Ma’aden Umm Wu’al, operating at a total
throughput of 1850tph (Mining Technology, 2023).
In this paper, the main focus is the application of pre-
concentration and sorting to metalliferous ores, where fac-
tors, such as recovery and loss of grade to waste, are of far
greater concern than in the industrial minerals sector.
Of the many changes that have occurred which,
directly or indirectly, impact sorting, some of the most sig-
nificant, are listed below and will be examined in the fol-
lowing section.
Table 1. Ore sorting for quality improvement in industrial
minerals
Primary Ore/Feed Material Contaminant
Lithium Iron
Phosphate Silica
Talc Dolomite, calcite, quartz,
basalt
Barite Quartz
Limestone (high-purity) Quartz, Calc-Silicates
Quartz Schist, feldspar, shale, calcite
Previous Page Next Page

Extracted Text (may have errors)

398
Beyond Amenability and Technology: Key Constraints in the
Wider Deployment of Sorting Systems
Richard Bearman, David Bowman
Bear Rock Solutions Pty. Ltd.
Greg Wilkie
Diamondbacks Pty. Ltd.
Robert Dunne
Robert Dunne Consulting
ABSTRACT: The amenability of a given mineral, or orebody, to sorting and preconcentration and the sensing/
sorting technology required, attracts a great deal of attention. Beyond this base amenability, the practical uptake
and implementation of sorting systems is highly reliant on the wider system and the overall impact on project
financial metrics. Key factors to consider include, consistency of performance, materials handling, stream
preparation, destination for sorting products, operability, derived revenue and cost. Another key area relates to
the evaluation of sorting within the context of a mine studies timeline and implications for other areas in the
studies. The factors are examined and described, with the aim of identifying to potential users of sorting, what
factors must be considered as part of the wider deployment picture.
INTRODUCTION
The focus and targets for sorting are highly dependent on
the orebody and end-use. Broadly, in metalliferous ores,
the target is grade enhancement, whilst in bulk commodi-
ties, including industrial minerals, the priority is qual-
ity. Examples of sorting targets, outside of direct grade
enhancement, include those shown in Table 1.
Industrial minerals applications represent significant
market segments, particularly for particle-based sorters.
The largest overall sorter installations are found in this sec-
tor, including the Ma’aden Umm Wu’al, operating at a total
throughput of 1850tph (Mining Technology, 2023).
In this paper, the main focus is the application of pre-
concentration and sorting to metalliferous ores, where fac-
tors, such as recovery and loss of grade to waste, are of far
greater concern than in the industrial minerals sector.
Of the many changes that have occurred which,
directly or indirectly, impact sorting, some of the most sig-
nificant, are listed below and will be examined in the fol-
lowing section.
Table 1. Ore sorting for quality improvement in industrial
minerals
Primary Ore/Feed Material Contaminant
Lithium Iron
Phosphate Silica
Talc Dolomite, calcite, quartz,
basalt
Barite Quartz
Limestone (high-purity) Quartz, Calc-Silicates
Quartz Schist, feldspar, shale, calcite

Help

loading