762
Management of Thiocyanate and Thiosalts in
Gold Extraction Project
Bret Baker, Kresimir Ljubetic, Guillermo Armendariz
BQE Water
ABSTRACT: As ore bodies and metallurgical flowsheets for gold extraction become increasingly complex,
managing by-products generated during mineral processing requires growing attention. One group of
constituents that can cause significant environmental and economic impacts for gold projects are thiospecies
containing reduced or partially oxidized sulphur atoms such as thiocyanate and thiosalts. This paper discusses
the implications of thiocyanate and thiosalts and reviews management systems to avoid and mitigate their
impacts through holistic water management in gold processing. Findings from case studies of active gold mines
will be provided, including life cycle cost-benefit analyses and assessments of system constraints and limitations
that need to be carefully considered for each project.
INTRODUCTION
While Thiocyanate and thiosalts are present in many indus-
trial processes, this paper focuses on their significance in
base and precious metals mining. Although thiocyanate is
less toxic than cyanide, its impact on the receiving envi-
ronment can be significant. In general, thiosalts can lead
to toxicity in the environment through oxidation down-
stream which contributes acid and can remobilize metals or
drop pH to a toxic level. Further, the oxidation by-products
can increase total dissolved metals (TDS) of the down-
stream solution, also affecting the health of the receiving
environment.
In Canada, Metal and Diamond Mining Effluent
Regulations (MDMER) impose limits for all mining oper-
ations to ensure any effluent does not cause acute lethal-
ity to rainbow trout and Daphnia magna. Thiocyanate has
an LC50 value of 150 ppm for rainbow trout in 96-hour
period, which is incorporated into Ontario operating mines
being held to a discharge limit of 150 mg/L SCN (Douglas
Gould 2012). Given that thiocyanate can be toxic to aquatic
life at relatively low concentrations, many mines are facing
a need to develop new strategies for the removal of thiosalts
and thiocyanate before the effluent can be considered safe
for discharge to the receiving environment.
Physical separation by membrane (reverse osmosis and
nanofiltration), biological oxidation in aerobic bioreactors,
and chemical oxidation in advanced oxidation processes
are current removal methods of thiosalts and thiocyanate.
Biological and chemical oxidation completely oxidize these
thio species into sulphate, and for thiocyanate nitrate and
carbonate, per reaction 1:
x SCN O2 yH2O SO CO NO3
4
2-
2 "++++-(1)
Despite its potential efficacy, biological treatment of thio-
cyanate contains weaknesses, including:
ii. Risk of acute and chronic toxicity by increasing
metal bioavailability
iii. Reaction rates are sensitive to temperature
fluctuations
Management of Thiocyanate and Thiosalts in
Gold Extraction Project
Bret Baker, Kresimir Ljubetic, Guillermo Armendariz
BQE Water
ABSTRACT: As ore bodies and metallurgical flowsheets for gold extraction become increasingly complex,
managing by-products generated during mineral processing requires growing attention. One group of
constituents that can cause significant environmental and economic impacts for gold projects are thiospecies
containing reduced or partially oxidized sulphur atoms such as thiocyanate and thiosalts. This paper discusses
the implications of thiocyanate and thiosalts and reviews management systems to avoid and mitigate their
impacts through holistic water management in gold processing. Findings from case studies of active gold mines
will be provided, including life cycle cost-benefit analyses and assessments of system constraints and limitations
that need to be carefully considered for each project.
INTRODUCTION
While Thiocyanate and thiosalts are present in many indus-
trial processes, this paper focuses on their significance in
base and precious metals mining. Although thiocyanate is
less toxic than cyanide, its impact on the receiving envi-
ronment can be significant. In general, thiosalts can lead
to toxicity in the environment through oxidation down-
stream which contributes acid and can remobilize metals or
drop pH to a toxic level. Further, the oxidation by-products
can increase total dissolved metals (TDS) of the down-
stream solution, also affecting the health of the receiving
environment.
In Canada, Metal and Diamond Mining Effluent
Regulations (MDMER) impose limits for all mining oper-
ations to ensure any effluent does not cause acute lethal-
ity to rainbow trout and Daphnia magna. Thiocyanate has
an LC50 value of 150 ppm for rainbow trout in 96-hour
period, which is incorporated into Ontario operating mines
being held to a discharge limit of 150 mg/L SCN (Douglas
Gould 2012). Given that thiocyanate can be toxic to aquatic
life at relatively low concentrations, many mines are facing
a need to develop new strategies for the removal of thiosalts
and thiocyanate before the effluent can be considered safe
for discharge to the receiving environment.
Physical separation by membrane (reverse osmosis and
nanofiltration), biological oxidation in aerobic bioreactors,
and chemical oxidation in advanced oxidation processes
are current removal methods of thiosalts and thiocyanate.
Biological and chemical oxidation completely oxidize these
thio species into sulphate, and for thiocyanate nitrate and
carbonate, per reaction 1:
x SCN O2 yH2O SO CO NO3
4
2-
2 "++++-(1)
Despite its potential efficacy, biological treatment of thio-
cyanate contains weaknesses, including:
ii. Risk of acute and chronic toxicity by increasing
metal bioavailability
iii. Reaction rates are sensitive to temperature
fluctuations