XXXI International Mineral Processing Congress 2024 Proceedings/Washington, DC/Sep 29–Oct 3 3131
17.66
21.13 20.15
22.79
72.29
82.13
80.45
85.56
0.097 0.11 0.1 0.11
63.16
67.41
63.01
65.44
None Sodium silicate Lime+Sodium silicate Lime
0.0
0.1
5
10
15
20
25
50
60
70
80
90
100
Cu grade
Cu recovery
Mo grade
Mo recovery
Figure 7. Effects of depressant types on recoveries and grades of Cu and Mo in concentrates
Ore
Roughing
70% -0.074mm
6
Cleaning¢ñ
3
Cleaning¢ó
Mid.2
4
Cleaning¢ò
3
Mid.1 Conc.
Grinding
2 NaHS 100
2 BK386 32
2 SIBX 7
2 BK233 40
Tailing
2 Lime
pH=10.00
Regrinding 81.7% -0.045mm
Figure 8. Flowchart of re-grinding fineness tests for cleaning process
Grade
/r
overy,%
Previous Page Next Page

Extracted Text (may have errors)

XXXI International Mineral Processing Congress 2024 Proceedings/Washington, DC/Sep 29–Oct 3 3131
17.66
21.13 20.15
22.79
72.29
82.13
80.45
85.56
0.097 0.11 0.1 0.11
63.16
67.41
63.01
65.44
None Sodium silicate Lime+Sodium silicate Lime
0.0
0.1
5
10
15
20
25
50
60
70
80
90
100
Cu grade
Cu recovery
Mo grade
Mo recovery
Figure 7. Effects of depressant types on recoveries and grades of Cu and Mo in concentrates
Ore
Roughing
70% -0.074mm
6
Cleaning¢ñ
3
Cleaning¢ó
Mid.2
4
Cleaning¢ò
3
Mid.1 Conc.
Grinding
2 NaHS 100
2 BK386 32
2 SIBX 7
2 BK233 40
Tailing
2 Lime
pH=10.00
Regrinding 81.7% -0.045mm
Figure 8. Flowchart of re-grinding fineness tests for cleaning process
Grade
/r
overy,%

Help

loading