5
former CEMSA mineral processing plant were located. The
project was developed in the village of Tumbacucho, dis-
trict, and province of Hualgayoc, Cajamarca.
The CIEMAM professionals were responsible for the
closure activities, with the primary goal of eliminating envi-
ronmental and safety risks posed to people and local wild-
life by the presence of mining liabilities.
The substantial work focused on reshaping the ter-
rain and reducing the impact of runoff drainage. The land
formation and restoration allowed for the incorporation
of natural covers and the introduction of vegetation with
added species, providing additional value to neighboring
communities and benefiting the local economy (Figures 6
and 7).
The encapsulated lower terrain will support short-stem
agriculture (e.g., lettuce, potatoes) and livestock grazing.
Studies suggest that geomembranes are robust enough to
support agricultural practices when combined with topsoil
layers, ensuring productivity without contaminant expo-
sure (UNEP, 2019). A participatory agricultural model,
incorporating local farmers, could enhance community
acceptance and project sustainability (Sánchez et al., 2015).
Community Engagement and Social Impact
Local community involvement is critical for successful
implementation. CIEMAN (2023) notes that participa-
tory approaches, including workshops and focus groups,
improve project design by incorporating indigenous knowl-
edge and addressing local concerns.
In this example:
• Community meetings would help identify cultural
and economic priorities for the rehabilitated land.
• Educational campaigns on sustainable land use and
environmental health would increase local capacity
to manage rehabilitated areas effectively.
Social surveys conducted in nearby rehabilitated sites
revealed that communities perceive dual-purpose projects as
highly beneficial when tangible outcomes, such as employ-
ment and income generation, are evident (Fernández &
Morales, 2022 Sánchez et al., 2015).
Economic Feasibility and Sustainability
CIEMAN’s findings indicate that cost-benefit analyses
often favor projects that integrate environmental remedia-
tion with economic productivity. For this example:
• Initial Costs: Installation of geomembranes, soil sta-
bilization, and recreational infrastructure.
• Revenue Sources: Eco-tourism fees, agricultural
sales, and livestock products.
A 10-year economic projection by the World Bank
(2020) for similar projects in Latin America demonstrated
a return on investment of 12–15%, with local communities
gaining long-term financial independence.
REFERENCES
[1] 3Smith, Robert J. and Nancy A. Jones (1991),
“Writing a Better Paper,” Association News, June,
pp. 67–75.
[2] CIEMAN. (2023). Informe sobre pasivos ambien-
tales y remediación en Cajamarca. CIEMAN.org.
[3] Fernández, P., &Morales, H. (2022). Ecoturismo
en áreas rehabilitadas: Un modelo sostenible para
Figure 6. San Agustin waste rock dumps before. (CIEMAN,
2023)
Figure 7. San Agustin waste rock dumps After. (CIEMAN,
2023)
former CEMSA mineral processing plant were located. The
project was developed in the village of Tumbacucho, dis-
trict, and province of Hualgayoc, Cajamarca.
The CIEMAM professionals were responsible for the
closure activities, with the primary goal of eliminating envi-
ronmental and safety risks posed to people and local wild-
life by the presence of mining liabilities.
The substantial work focused on reshaping the ter-
rain and reducing the impact of runoff drainage. The land
formation and restoration allowed for the incorporation
of natural covers and the introduction of vegetation with
added species, providing additional value to neighboring
communities and benefiting the local economy (Figures 6
and 7).
The encapsulated lower terrain will support short-stem
agriculture (e.g., lettuce, potatoes) and livestock grazing.
Studies suggest that geomembranes are robust enough to
support agricultural practices when combined with topsoil
layers, ensuring productivity without contaminant expo-
sure (UNEP, 2019). A participatory agricultural model,
incorporating local farmers, could enhance community
acceptance and project sustainability (Sánchez et al., 2015).
Community Engagement and Social Impact
Local community involvement is critical for successful
implementation. CIEMAN (2023) notes that participa-
tory approaches, including workshops and focus groups,
improve project design by incorporating indigenous knowl-
edge and addressing local concerns.
In this example:
• Community meetings would help identify cultural
and economic priorities for the rehabilitated land.
• Educational campaigns on sustainable land use and
environmental health would increase local capacity
to manage rehabilitated areas effectively.
Social surveys conducted in nearby rehabilitated sites
revealed that communities perceive dual-purpose projects as
highly beneficial when tangible outcomes, such as employ-
ment and income generation, are evident (Fernández &
Morales, 2022 Sánchez et al., 2015).
Economic Feasibility and Sustainability
CIEMAN’s findings indicate that cost-benefit analyses
often favor projects that integrate environmental remedia-
tion with economic productivity. For this example:
• Initial Costs: Installation of geomembranes, soil sta-
bilization, and recreational infrastructure.
• Revenue Sources: Eco-tourism fees, agricultural
sales, and livestock products.
A 10-year economic projection by the World Bank
(2020) for similar projects in Latin America demonstrated
a return on investment of 12–15%, with local communities
gaining long-term financial independence.
REFERENCES
[1] 3Smith, Robert J. and Nancy A. Jones (1991),
“Writing a Better Paper,” Association News, June,
pp. 67–75.
[2] CIEMAN. (2023). Informe sobre pasivos ambien-
tales y remediación en Cajamarca. CIEMAN.org.
[3] Fernández, P., &Morales, H. (2022). Ecoturismo
en áreas rehabilitadas: Un modelo sostenible para
Figure 6. San Agustin waste rock dumps before. (CIEMAN,
2023)
Figure 7. San Agustin waste rock dumps After. (CIEMAN,
2023)