XXXI International Mineral Processing Congress 2024 Proceedings/Washington, DC/Sep 29–Oct 3 739
Future evaluations are required to optimize the dos-
age to establish its economic benefits while achieving
the dewatered characteristic required by the end user.
Gold Tailings
TNS technology has been proven, using two differ-
ent gold tailings materials, to consistently reduce fil-
tration time and improve the quality of the produced
cake. Sample #1, demonstrates that this technology
effectively eliminates thixotropy without requiring
the blowing stage, thereby reducing both CAPEX
and OPEX.
Iron Tailings
The TNS technology successfully dewatered iron
ore slimes pressure filtration. This additive is a robust
material that can be used at different dosages and still
effectively dewaters these challenging slimes.
The pressure filtration results indicate that this tech-
nology is capable of handling up to two orders of
magnitude higher solids loading rate compared to
conventional technology.
REFERENCES
Adiansyah S., Rosano M., Vink S., Keir G. A framework
for a sustainable approach to mine tailings manage-
ment: disposal strategies, J Clean Prod, 108 (2015),
pp. 1050–1062, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.139.
Barrera, S. Arredondo, M. Madariaga, P. Scognamillo, C.
Tailings management a simple way to increase water
reclaim. In Proceedings of the 11th International
Conference on Tailings and Mine Waste, Vail, CO, USA,
10–13 October 2004 A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam, The
Netherlands, 2004 pp. 39–44.
Boger D.V. Rheology of slurries and environmental impacts
in the mining industry. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng, 4
(2013), pp. 239–257.
Bowker L., Chambers D. In the dark shadow of the super-
cycle tailings failure risk &public liability reach all
time highs Environments, 4 (2017), p. 75.
Figure 10. Iron Ore Slime Tailings—pressure filtration filter cake
Table 4. Iron Ore Slime Tailings -Pressure Filtration
Parameters Units Without TNS™
With
TNS™ 1
With
TNS™ 2
With
TNS™ 3
Feed Moisture1 wt. %60.8 68.2 68.1 67.7
Form Time min Discontinued after 35 minutes 5.5 6.5 5.5
Air Blow Drying Time min none none none 1
Form Step End Moisture wt.% Not measured 23.2 22.8 23.6
Air Blow Step End Moisture wt.% Not measured Not measured Not measured 20.92
Average Filtration Rate (K/h)/m2 none 302 334 305
Observation Slow, no cake produced Competent cake Competent cake Competent cake
Form pressure of 1,500 kPa
1. After reagent addition
2. Air by-passed at cake edge because of cake shrinkage
Previous Page Next Page