XXXI International Mineral Processing Congress 2024 Proceedings/Washington, DC/Sep 29–Oct 3 473
y =0.9x +25.5
R² =0.1
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60
Colorimeter response
y =1.3x +2.3
R² =0.3
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60
Laser response
y =0.9x +3.3
R² =0.8
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
XRF response
y =0.4x +29.8
R² =0.8
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
XRT response
A) B)
D) C)
Figure 5. SRL of the four sensors
Ordered by assay CaCO
3
grade
Ordered by sensor response
Ordered by assay CaCO
3
grade
Ordered by sensor response
A) B)
Figure 6. Cumulative recovery and cumulative grade of A) the C fraction and B) the F fraction ordered by the XRF response
CaCO 3
grade
(%)
CaCO 3
grade
(%)
CaCO 3
grade
(%)
CaCO 3
grade
(%)
y =0.9x +25.5
R² =0.1
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60
Colorimeter response
y =1.3x +2.3
R² =0.3
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60
Laser response
y =0.9x +3.3
R² =0.8
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
XRF response
y =0.4x +29.8
R² =0.8
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
XRT response
A) B)
D) C)
Figure 5. SRL of the four sensors
Ordered by assay CaCO
3
grade
Ordered by sensor response
Ordered by assay CaCO
3
grade
Ordered by sensor response
A) B)
Figure 6. Cumulative recovery and cumulative grade of A) the C fraction and B) the F fraction ordered by the XRF response
CaCO 3
grade
(%)
CaCO 3
grade
(%)
CaCO 3
grade
(%)
CaCO 3
grade
(%)