3726 XXXI International Mineral Processing Congress 2024 Proceedings/Washington, DC/Sep 29–Oct 3
Figure 7. Percentage Increase in Dynamic Voidage Relative to Static Voidage for Different Jt Values. (a) For Jt of 15 (b) For Jt
of 30 (c) For Jt of 45
Figure 8. Statistical Output of Minitab Software. (a) P-value, (b) R-squared (R2)
Table 6. Size Distribution and Static Voidage of Balls inside the operational ball mill of the Sarcheshmeh copper complex
processing plant (Hesami, 2016)
Ball Size Distribution Static Voidage (%)
Size (mm) +70 –70+60 –60+50 –50+40 –40 Worn balls
36
Percentage weight 47.5 27.2 14.1 5.8 1.6 4
Figure 7. Percentage Increase in Dynamic Voidage Relative to Static Voidage for Different Jt Values. (a) For Jt of 15 (b) For Jt
of 30 (c) For Jt of 45
Figure 8. Statistical Output of Minitab Software. (a) P-value, (b) R-squared (R2)
Table 6. Size Distribution and Static Voidage of Balls inside the operational ball mill of the Sarcheshmeh copper complex
processing plant (Hesami, 2016)
Ball Size Distribution Static Voidage (%)
Size (mm) +70 –70+60 –60+50 –50+40 –40 Worn balls
36
Percentage weight 47.5 27.2 14.1 5.8 1.6 4