2584 XXXI International Mineral Processing Congress 2024 Proceedings/Washington, DC/Sep 29–Oct 3
10.00
14.50
19.00
23.50
28.00
90
92
94
96
98
100
0.4 0.6 0.8
Collector dosage, kg/t
FA-1 Recovery CF 390 Recovery FA-1 grade CF 390 Garde
Figure 2. P
2 O
5 recovery and grade versus collector dosage with traditional FA1 and CustoFloat 390 schemes
R(FA-1) =17.55t +1.24
R(CF 390) =18.22t +1.86
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 45 60
Time, s
FA-1 CF 390 Linear (FA-1) Linear (CF 390)
Figure 3. Flotation kinetics of FA-1 and CustoFloat 390
Grade,
%
Recov
ery%
,
Accumulated
Recov
ery%
,
10.00
14.50
19.00
23.50
28.00
90
92
94
96
98
100
0.4 0.6 0.8
Collector dosage, kg/t
FA-1 Recovery CF 390 Recovery FA-1 grade CF 390 Garde
Figure 2. P
2 O
5 recovery and grade versus collector dosage with traditional FA1 and CustoFloat 390 schemes
R(FA-1) =17.55t +1.24
R(CF 390) =18.22t +1.86
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 45 60
Time, s
FA-1 CF 390 Linear (FA-1) Linear (CF 390)
Figure 3. Flotation kinetics of FA-1 and CustoFloat 390
Grade,
%
Recov
ery%
,
Accumulated
Recov
ery%
,