168 XXXI International Mineral Processing Congress 2024 Proceedings/Washington, DC/Sep 29–Oct 3
100 µm for carbon capture purposes only. A block flow
diagram for this plant (based on Gerdeman et al., 2007)
is shown in Figure 4, also showing the parts of the circuit
considered in this paper and what was considered out of
scope. It is assumed that this plant is located in a district
with ‘average’ emissions associated with power generation
and it is assumed it operates at 92% availability.
Table 4 lists ore characteristics used for this calculation.
These characteristics are based on the 80th percentile ore
properties for ultramafic ores listed in the public database
0.00
0.03
0.06
0.09
0.12
0.15
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
Concrete Steel
Figure 3. Concrete and steel usage in process plant construction. Concrete usage in left-hand axis, steel usage in right-hand axis
Figure 4. Conceptual block flow diagram for a CO
2 sequestration milling circuit
Steel
(t/kWh
installed)
Concrete
usage
(m3/kWh
installed)
100 µm for carbon capture purposes only. A block flow
diagram for this plant (based on Gerdeman et al., 2007)
is shown in Figure 4, also showing the parts of the circuit
considered in this paper and what was considered out of
scope. It is assumed that this plant is located in a district
with ‘average’ emissions associated with power generation
and it is assumed it operates at 92% availability.
Table 4 lists ore characteristics used for this calculation.
These characteristics are based on the 80th percentile ore
properties for ultramafic ores listed in the public database
0.00
0.03
0.06
0.09
0.12
0.15
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
Concrete Steel
Figure 3. Concrete and steel usage in process plant construction. Concrete usage in left-hand axis, steel usage in right-hand axis
Figure 4. Conceptual block flow diagram for a CO
2 sequestration milling circuit
Steel
(t/kWh
installed)
Concrete
usage
(m3/kWh
installed)