1154 XXXI International Mineral Processing Congress 2024 Proceedings/Washington, DC/Sep 29–Oct 3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5
Drum inclination (Degrees)
2LPM
6LPM
(a)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1.5 3.5 5.5 7.5
Wash water (LPM)
Inclination angle 3
Inclination angle 5
(b)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
165 185 205 225 245
Drum Rotational Speed (RPM)
Inclination
angle 3
Inclination
angle 5
(c)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
170 190 210 230
Drum Rotational Speed (RPM)
2LPM
6LPM
(d)
Figure 6. Effect of process variables on recovery (Weight %)of the concentrate fraction (a. Effect of Drum angle of inclination
at different wash water, b. Effect of Wash water at different angle of inclinations c. Effect of drum rotational speed at different
angle of inclination. d. Effect of Drum rotational speed at different wash water.)
REFERENCES
Ajay B. Solanki, Jolly R. Parikh and Rajesh H. Parikh
“Formulation and Optimisation of Piroxicam Proniosomes
by 3- Factor, 3- Level Box—Behnken Design,” AAPS
PharmaSciTech 2007: 8(4) Article 86, pp E1–E7.
Aslan, N, H Kaya, 2009. “Beneficiation of chromite concen-
tration waste by multi gravity separator and high intensity
induced roll magnetic separator,” The Arabian journal
for Science and Engineering, 34 (2B) pp 285–297.
Aslan, N, 2008a, “multi-objective optimization of some pro-
cess parameters of a multi gravity separator for chromite
concentration,” Separation and Purification Technology,
64, pp237–241.
Aslan, N., 2008 ”Application of response surface methodology
and central composite rotatable design for modelling and
optimisation of multi gravity separator for chromite con-
centration,” Powder Technology, 185, pp80–86.
Bandopadyaya, A., 2000. “Multi gravity separator – An
equipment for separation of fines,” Processing of Fines
(2), NML Jamshedpur, pp 81–92.
Çiçek T, and I. Cöcen, “Applicability of Mozley Multi-Gravity
Separator (MGS) to Fine chromite Tailings of Turkish
Chromite Concentrating Plants,” Minerals Engineering,
15(2002), pp. 91–93.
Concentrate
Recovery
(Weight
%)
Concentrate
Recovery
(Weight
%)
Concentrate
Recovery
(Weight
%)
Concentrate
Recovery
(Weight
%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5
Drum inclination (Degrees)
2LPM
6LPM
(a)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1.5 3.5 5.5 7.5
Wash water (LPM)
Inclination angle 3
Inclination angle 5
(b)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
165 185 205 225 245
Drum Rotational Speed (RPM)
Inclination
angle 3
Inclination
angle 5
(c)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
170 190 210 230
Drum Rotational Speed (RPM)
2LPM
6LPM
(d)
Figure 6. Effect of process variables on recovery (Weight %)of the concentrate fraction (a. Effect of Drum angle of inclination
at different wash water, b. Effect of Wash water at different angle of inclinations c. Effect of drum rotational speed at different
angle of inclination. d. Effect of Drum rotational speed at different wash water.)
REFERENCES
Ajay B. Solanki, Jolly R. Parikh and Rajesh H. Parikh
“Formulation and Optimisation of Piroxicam Proniosomes
by 3- Factor, 3- Level Box—Behnken Design,” AAPS
PharmaSciTech 2007: 8(4) Article 86, pp E1–E7.
Aslan, N, H Kaya, 2009. “Beneficiation of chromite concen-
tration waste by multi gravity separator and high intensity
induced roll magnetic separator,” The Arabian journal
for Science and Engineering, 34 (2B) pp 285–297.
Aslan, N, 2008a, “multi-objective optimization of some pro-
cess parameters of a multi gravity separator for chromite
concentration,” Separation and Purification Technology,
64, pp237–241.
Aslan, N., 2008 ”Application of response surface methodology
and central composite rotatable design for modelling and
optimisation of multi gravity separator for chromite con-
centration,” Powder Technology, 185, pp80–86.
Bandopadyaya, A., 2000. “Multi gravity separator – An
equipment for separation of fines,” Processing of Fines
(2), NML Jamshedpur, pp 81–92.
Çiçek T, and I. Cöcen, “Applicability of Mozley Multi-Gravity
Separator (MGS) to Fine chromite Tailings of Turkish
Chromite Concentrating Plants,” Minerals Engineering,
15(2002), pp. 91–93.
Concentrate
Recovery
(Weight
%)
Concentrate
Recovery
(Weight
%)
Concentrate
Recovery
(Weight
%)
Concentrate
Recovery
(Weight
%)